WHAT WOULD IT COST IF WE HAD CONSTITUTIONAL MONEY?

Would you like to know what gas (and any other purchase) would cost if our U.S. currency was still based on the market values of gold and silver?

Click here to compare and calculate the purchasing power of money in 2007 dollars compared to the same amount of dollars had Congress 'preserved, protected and defended' the Consitutional Coinage Act of 1792.

From the Economic Expert:

The Coinage Act, passed by the U.S. Congress on April 2, 1792, established the U.S. Mint and regulated coinage of the United States. The long title of the legislation is An act establishing a mint, and regulating the Coins of the United States.

By the Act, the Mint was to be situated at the seat of government of the United States. The five original officers of the U.S. Mint were a Director, an Assayer, a Chief Coiner, an Engraver, and a Treasurer (not the same as the Secretary of the Treasury. The Act allowed that one person could perform the functions of Chief Coiner and Engraver. The Assayer, Chief Coiner and Treasurer were required to post a $10,000 bond with the Secretary of the Treasury.

Notably, the act established a decimal standard for U.S. currency. The Act authorized production of the following coins:

Eagles - $10 - 247 4/8 grain pure or 270 grain standard gold
Half Eagles - $5 - 123 6/8 grain pure or 135 grain standard gold
Quarter Eagles - $2.50 - 61 7/8 grain pure or 67 4/8 grain standard gold
Dollars or Units - $1 - 371 4/16 grain pure or 416 grain standard silver
Half Dollars - $0.50 - 185 10/16 grain pure or 208 grain standard silver
Quarter Dollars - $0.25 - 92 13/16 grain pure or 104 grains standard silver
Dismes - $0.10 - 37 2/16 grain pure or 41 3/5 grain standard silver
Half Dismes - $0.05 - 18 9/16 grain pure or 20 4/5 standard silver
Cents - $0.01 - 11 penny-weights of copper
Half Cents - $0.005 - 5 1/2 penny-weights of copper

Continue here . . .

WHY IS THE HELP AMERICA VOTE ACT MANDATORY? Updated 1-26-08

Watch how Ron Paul differs from other Republican Presidential Candidates.

See how easy it is for a hireling to use HAVA mandated electronic equipment to manipulate an election.

Who benefits from HAVA, the Help America Vote Act?
Who benefits when elections are rigged?

WHY IS DIS-EASE SO PREVELANT IN THE UNITED STATES? (Updated 12/7/07)

Honestly examine your feelings as you watch this short video:

Then, watch this 7 minute video

and join Carl Klang as he sings "We Want Our Country Back."

Now: Can you believe there are political candidates who will have you believe the absurd notion that we have security in our homeland? And that by subsidizing the profits of private insurance companies and pharmaceutical shareholders, lowering taxes on fiat money, and increasing foreign trade (with persons who know your DNA and hate you), they will be able to solve the problems that we are currently experiencing in America?

So; When you go to the polls to vote, remember that IT HAS BEEN THE MEMBERS OF THE DEMOCRAT AND REPUBLICAN PARTIES who have made the laws upon which the courts must act and sent into foreign conflicts our young men and women.

Show that you care.

Next time you vote, write in the candidate of your choice. Or, vote for candidates who have gained ballot access with a minor party.

America Needs A Doctor

Who Will You Call?


Ron Paul

(Courtesy of Rose Lear)

AMERICA: LOVE IT OR LOSE IT

Take 30 minutes to view Edward Griffin's shocking video interview Soviet Subversion of the Free Press (1984) where he interviews ex-KGB agent and soviet defector Yuri Bezmenov who decided to openly reveal KGB's subversive tactics against western society as a whole.

AMERICAN LIFE UNDER A DEMOCRATIC FORM OF GOVERNMENT

The United States is foisting its commercial styled "democracy" upon nations worldwide. The good people in these nations need to know what life is like for Americans who believe themselves to be free. They need to know that our nation, too, has been occupied by a belligerent commercial power and, by presumption - in a business-as-usual manner - what is being done to us, will - without question - be done to them.

In a "nutshell" here's how it works:

In the United States, without regard to comity, an oligarchy of plutocrats hand pick law makers who promise Americans benefits and privileges upon "application". Along with the application process, there is (usually) a request for a sum of money to legally seal the contract.

The oligarchy oversee their lawmakers to assure that the laws they pass will legally convey to them title to all that is privately owned.

In the United States one example of the oligarchy's incremental occupation of America can be found in the doublespeak of the 13th Amendment. Notice that while "Involuntary servitude" is outlawed, "voluntary servitude" by application is not. Notice also that section 2 of the 13th Amendment the oligarchy assured their continued dominion by inserting; "Congress shall have the Power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation"; and, "legislation" defines the laws upon which the courts must act. Furthermore, craftily worded "laws" and "rules" convict men and women of crimes, which, under the Ten Commandments, they would be acquitted.

It doesn't take a genius to figure out that the more irrelevant the law, the more convictions the judges in their courts can adjudicate, the more fines they can impose, and the more jobs they can create to keep the (statutory) criminals in check.

Because "comity" for the Ten Commandments and the commonlaw are not within their laws, if an otherwise free American man or woman asserts that he or she does not want the benefits and privileges of this insidious fraudulent form of indebted servitude and chooses not to volunteer, he or she is treated as a "fugitive slave" and will be duly convicted of some statutory crime, seemingly under some hidden "code".

When an American questions statute, code, jurisdiction or authority, the oligarchy has legislated to themselves a marvelous network of protections wherein they "exempt" themselves from ever having to give account to their creditors, i.e., the American people to whom the plutocrats are indebted by virtue of their imposed debt based monetary system.

The picture (below) describes what it feels like for freedom loving Americans under the oppressive dominion of the corporate United States. As pictured, some have already been wholly, or partially devoured emotionally and financially: The rest know that it is just a matter of time before it is them.

"Comity toward nations", is a concept that is disregarded in the legislation put forth by agents of the plutocratic oligarchy as they economically conquer our nations under the guise of "democracy".

Comity is defined as: courteous respect by one nation for the laws and institutions of another
. . .
Comity of nations in International Law is the courtesy by which nations recognize within their own territory, or in their courts, the peculiar institutions of another nation or the rights and privileges acquired by its citizens in their own land. By some authorities private international law rests on this comity, but the better opinion is that it is part of the common law of the land, and hence is obligatory as law.

A synonym for comity is: Civility; good breeding; courtesy; good will.

THE INCREASE IN THE MINIMUM WAGE IS ESSENTIALLY "TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION"

The raise in the minimum wage issue, when understood, is one of the best examples of bipartisan doublespeak and issues management. Democrats and Republicans dutifully parrot the rhetoric that is carefully designed to hype emotions and provide profits to the business-as-usual commercial schemes of their corporate masters.

Since Congress relinquished its power to coin money to a private cartel of bankers in 1913, there has been a progressive hidden tax involved with the minting of metallically devalued coins and the printing of Federal Reserve notes. For instance; It cost the owners of the Federal Reserve between $.04 (four cents) and $.07 (seven cents) to print a "bill" of any denomination. At 4 cents per bill, for every $10 of a man (or woman's) labor, $9.96 is pocketed by the owners of the Federal Reserve and an additional $2 (approximately 20% of the $10) is demanded by IRS agents on behalf of their employers; the owners of the Federal Reserve. Therefore, for every $10 of a man or woman's labor, that man or woman is indebted approximately $11.96 to the owners of the Federal Reserve.

If and When the wage increase (currently before Congress) goes into effect, it will not be the perceived "wage earner" who will profit; nor will it be the businessman or woman for whom the laborer, labors. The ONLY people who will profit from this increase will be the owners of the Federal Reserve and their parent corporation.

Here's the math:

At 4 cents/bill, the owners of the Federal Reserve will profit $1.92 for the two (2) additional bills they will print, plus the additional 20% (i.e., $.384 cents) from the collection of additional "Income Tax", thereby bringing their total hourly increase per laborer to an approximate $2.304 per hour.

For a forty (40) hour work week, at $2.304 per hour, the laborer will have increased his or her indebtedness , and the owners of the Federal Reserve's profits, an additional $92.16.

Over a 52 week work year, therefore, the owners of the Federal Reserve will have profited an additional $4,792.32 from every man and woman upon whom their noble representatives bestowed this perceived increase.

Unlike the monetary system outlined in the Constitution for these united States of America and the Coinage Act of 1791, we have today a despicable system of voluntary servitude that, with little disruption to the average American, could be legislated back under the powers of Congress whereby the IRS would be abolished, and the $9.96 for each $10 of an American's labor would be recycled into Constitutionally delegated services to be provided by Congress.

The continued bipartisan perpetuation of this irresponsible fraud on the American people by their elected representatives is morally reprehensible and solemn consideration should be given to any emotionally driven support you should have for the proposed wage increase currently before your representatives in Congress.

"OWNERSHIP"

Who has it?
How was it done?
What did it cost?Who profits?

Is there a solution?

Write-in Results

The official write-in results of the 2006 Pennsylvania General Election have been posted to the Department of State website. Click here to see the results. The Congressional results will be found on page two (2) of the document.

If you were someone who exercised your write-in options, "Thank you" for your participation.

THANK YOU

Thank you for asserting one, or more, of your write-in options at the polls during the 2006 Mid-Term Elections. Your participation was, and is, sincerely appreciated.

CAMPAIGN UPDATE

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of State, Bureau of Commissions, Elections and Legislation, and each of the Election Departments of the 14 counties within Pennsylvania's 10th Congressional District, received from me (by mail, e-mail or fax) a formal "CANDIDATE'S AFFIDAVIT and DECLARATION OF WRITE-IN CANDIDACY." The document, although not required in Pennsylvania, was prepared by leaders in the Ballot Access Coalition to formalize the 'write-in' process. The document provides for a list of nicknames, abbreviations and misspellings of the candidate's name so that, if challenged, the voter's intended choice may be objectively defended.

On the left column of this blog there are links to many statewide and local minor party, and independent, candidates who have submitted their declaration of write-in candidacy and are willing to serve in the office they specify.

CAMPAIGN ISSUES

CAMPAIGN ISSUES and OPTIONS

Like many voters who inhabit the 10th Congressional District of Pennsylvania I have been receiving the expensive, glossy, full color Hegelian styled, bipartisan, issues management campaign ads from Republican incumbent, Don Sherwood and Democrat, Chris Carney. Since the beginning of October, I have received (at least) 12 of these ads and the letter from Carol Sherwood exonerating her husband from what she refers to as, his "mistake." I noticed that each of these financially endowed candidates have used their political capital to defame the character of the other rather than exposing the truth; i.e., that they want nothing more than to continue the 'business-as-usual' practices and agenda for their plutocratic investors.

Recent published 'Letters to the Editor' (Scranton Times-Tribune - 10/19/06) suggests a heightened level of perception among their readers that neither candidate will be able to remedy the damage that has been done to the integrity of our constitutional republic. To paraphrase an old saying: Emotional rhetoric may dupe some of the people some of the time, but it cannot dupe all of the people all of the time. Here are a few examples of how these ads (taken from the recently published Letters to the Editor), are duping the people.

L M, who misspelled 'Hannevig', took issue that "Mr. Sherwood, an elected congressman, identified himself to a D.C police officer as a mere "government employee."" Sherwood, in my opinion, did not lie. Sherwood was financed to run to represent the modern day privy council's corporate governance. Both candidates, Don Sherwood and Chris Carney, were on the Board of Directors of the United Nations Association of Northeastern Pennsylvania (UNA-USA) in 2002. Either candidate is, therefore, obligated to his corporate employer.

D McB, C C, S P, and J G-E, all commented (in various ways) about Don Sherwood's infidelity while seeming to ignore the fact that Democrat Paul Kanjorski remained silent about this matter that, were he faithful to his party, may have swayed the presidential count in northeastern Pennsylvania to Kerry; the candidate whose values were thought to be less pious than Bush's. It's quite evident that leaders in the two parties consider "fidelity" to be relevant only to the party faithful on which they are dependent.

L B wrote, "Mr. Carney's record on the Second Amendment is dismal. He is rated an "F" by the NRA". I remind Mr. B that, in the Pennsylvania Constitution, Article 1, Section 21, "The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned." In Pennsylvania, the right to keep and bear arms is NOT a Second Amendment (Militia) issue. When purchasing arms, one question asked is, by Pennsylvania law, one question too many! The duty of a representative is to advocate for the citizens and their state to retain the unaliened rights implied by their State's Constitution. Therefore, the NRA's representative to Congress must be someone who will "preserve, protect and defend," with fidelity, the people's rights as retained and reserved to them by their state's constitution pursuant to the Ninth and Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. (The 9th and 10th Amendments limit federal encroachment into the powers of the State and the people therein.)

P M comments; "Don Sherwood has released an ad claiming that Chris Carney is going to raise your taxes." These tax issues, when understood, are the best example of bipartisan issue management. Whether Carney or Sherwood is elected to Congress will not matter. Both will be obligated to maintain or advance the various aspects of global governance envisioned by their corporate employers. Since Congress relinquished its power to coin money to a private cartel of bankers in 1913, there has been a progressive hidden tax involved with the printing of metallically devalued coins and Federal Reserve notes. For instance; It cost the owners of the Federal Reserve between $.04 (four cents) and $.07 (seven cents) to print a "bill" of any denomination. Therefore, at 4 cents/bill, for every $10 of a man (or woman's) labor, $9.96 is pocketed by the owners of the Federal Reserve and an additional $2 (approximately 20% of the $10) is demanded by IRS agents on behalf of their employers; the owners of the Federal Reserve.

The bipartisan issues management processes and procedures preclude open minor party and independent debate that would educate the voters to their approximate $11.96 indebtedness to the owners of the Federal Reserve for every $10 of their labor; a despicable system of voluntary servitude that, with little disruption to the average American, could be legislated back under the powers of Congress whereby the IRS would be abolished, and $9.96 would be recycled into the Constitutionally delegated services to be provided by Congress.

The continued bipartisan perpetuation of this irresponsible fraud on the American people by their bipartisan elected representatives to Congress is morally reprehensible and unlikely to be remedied by electing more bipartisan candidates.

Fortunately, as stated before, emotional rhetoric cannot dupe all of the people all of the time.

In Pennsylvania, more than 14,000 voters in the 10th Congressional District showed by their vote in the 2004 election that they wanted representative change in Congress. This year, it may take a few minutes more but, you can utilize the democratic process by writing-in minor party, or independent candidates who have showed a willingness to run, but did not attain 2006 ballot access. If you write me in, I would be honored to serve the concerned people of northeastern Pennsylvania who desire to transition from this insidious form of voluntary servitude to a bipartisan corporate governance, back into the envisioned blessings of Liberty as magnificently outlined in the Constitutions for these united States and the Pennsylvania republic.

'One of us cannot do everything, but one of us can do something.'

Click here to see where the candidates stand on immigration.

Write in Veronica A Hannevig for Congressional District 10

"What would Jesus and/or Mosheh do?"

Both Mosheh and Jesus knew the laws of nature, the laws of man, and the laws of GOD.

Both men, if they lived in the flesh today in Pennsylvania, would know that Article 1, Section 2 of the CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA states:

All power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority and instituted for their peace, safety and happiness. For the advancement of these ends they have at all times an inalienable and indefeasible right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may think proper.

Knowing that they had choices;

What would Jesus do? - What would Mosheh do?

Would they:

(a) alter, (b) reform, or (c) abolish

Their government?

WHAT WILL YOU DO?

Vigilance over YOUR Life, YOUR Liberty, YOUR Happiness, and YOUR Property, is YOUR responsibility!

Within our republic's democratic process; it is YOU that governs!

It is YOU that defines YOUR representative choices!

In November you will have one last chance to select, or write into your local ballot the minor party or independent candidates that YOU choose to represent YOU for the next 2 to 4 years.

Click here to see how to use your County's electronic voting equipment.

For Susquehanna County, click here.

For a technical analysis of the accuracy of your electronic voting equipment - in Spanish and English - watch the video below.

************

CNN's Lou Dobbs had a report on the North American Union. CNN has denied public access to the archived video clip, but - you can watch a portion of this clip in the video, America: Freedom to Fascism.

************

Watch Hazleton!

Hazelton's mayor, Lou Barletta's well meaning ordinance requires local government employees to screen applicants for "valid documentation" on behalf of local landlords. Ask yourself; Could Mayor Barletta's ordinance be getting this kind of political attention to create a public demand for a globally documented "citizen" that will make criminals of Americans who choose not to participate? What about you?

When you buy or sell, Which type of documentation will you find most acceptable?

Paper, plastic or chip?

************

Watch for the movie FREEDOM TO FASCISM when it opens in a theatre near you.

************

Institutionalize vigilance with the "We The People Congress" as Bob Schulz addresses the Right to Petition.
Work with Hagan Smith, to restore the Council of Censors in Pennsylvania.

Update on the Realities of the democratic process in a two party system

As most of my readers know I am in the process of collecting the signatures of registered electors ("voters") on "Nomination Papers"; a process required by the Commonwealth in order for minor parties to gain 'ballot access' for their nominees in the November, 2006 election. The party for which I am collecting the signatures is the Constitution Party. The Constitution Party offers Pennsylvanians, and our nation, a slate of Constitutionally correct candidates who will be held accountable to their oath of office: Not their political affiliation!

Here is what I have observed during this signature gathering process.

- The phenomena of "peer pressure" is just as prevalent in adults as it is in children.

- Many (not all) "pro-choice" abortion advocates choose (by not signing the petition) to withhold candidate choice from "pro-life" advocates.

- Most (again, not all) self-identified "Capitalists" reject the
Constitutional principles of Life, Liberty, Property and Happiness for themselves, and others who choose to engage in Capitalistic activities without liens and license.

- Gun Control advocates seem to sincerely believe that disarming sane, law abiding people, and hiring (sometimes unionized) others to protect them will somehow make their community safer. (I wonder where they think those hirelings will be if it's the hireling's own family that's being threatened?)

- Most (almost all) people think that Federal Reserve "bills" are Constitutionally sound units of currency. They sincerely believe that they can pay a debt with a unit of currency that creates additional debt.

- Although people are upset with taxes and IRS collection tactics, most have never questioned whether it is them, or foreign corporations that are lawfully liable to pay the tax.

- Concerned conservationists really believe that responsible resource management cannot take place within their local communities unless tenets of the United Nations' "Biodiversity Treaty" and "Agenda 21" are implemented by statutes, liens and penalties.

- Education, media, and government employees - at all levels of employment - appear to fear reprisal if they were to sign a petition that would allow Constitutionally correct candidates to be on a ballot. Some even seem uncomfortable to be seen talking with me.

Nevertheless, I will continue to collect signatures for ballot access for the Constitution Party's slate of nominees - including myself for Congressional District 10 - from now until the end of July.

If you are a registered voter whose behavior doesn't fit any of the above observations, your signature is needed. Your willingness to assist in the preservation of what is left of the democratic process of our lawful Constitutional "republic" will most likely be appreciated by future generations. Look for, or invite petitioners to local gatherings throughout Pennsylvania. And, check out the party's platform and candidates at www.constitutionparty.com.

Additionally, I'd like to extend a warm "Thank you!" to all who wrote in my name for the Republican and Democratic ballot position for Congressional District 10 during the recent Pennsylvania Primaries.

Veronica "Niki" Hannevig
P.O. Box 828
Simpson, Pennsylvania 18407
570-407-8060

HOW TO USE THE "DEMOCRATIC PROCESS" IN YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC

Our FORM of Government is NOT a "Democracy"!

It's a "Constitutional Republic"!

Are you a registered Democrat or Republican and care that you no longer have representation in your constitutionally guaranteed republic? That the two party Oligarchy has made a mockery of our nation's democratic process?

Then Declare Your Independence at the polls in 2006

Vote "Constitution"
Veronica A. Hannevig
For independent choice for
U.S. Congressional District 10 - Pennsylvania

Click here to see how to use your County's electronic equipment.
For Susquehanna County, click here.

An Open Apology to VFW Paciga Post 4712 - Simpson

VFW Post 4712, Commander, Robert Dragwa, coordinated a moving and insightful slate of music and speakers for this morning's Memorial Day ceremony. The honor guard, with decisiveness and precision, fired a Twenty-one gun salute to their fallen patriots.

After the ceremony, those in attendance were invited to partake of refreshments under a tent located to the rear of the post. As the attendees who chose to socialize after the event were in line for refreshments and eating at tables, I passed out a flyer and asked them to stop by a table in the back where I would be sitting with ballot access petitions, also called "Nomination Papers". I explained (to those who inquired) about the need to acquire approximately 67,000 signatures for 'statewide' offices, and 4,000 for me to be their choice on November's ballot for Congressional District 10 representation.

About 15 minutes into my 'table hopping', Commander Dragwa called me aside and asked me to leave, which I did.

Before leaving, however, I asked if I could schedule with him a video presentation about the Constitution Party candidates and where they stand on the issues pertinent to American Government. Commander Dragwa advised me that I would have to bring my request to a VFW meeting.

So, with that said, I strongly recommend that if you are someone who understands the need for representation in government, and are a member of the VFW, DAV, or any other service related organization, that you request to schedule a Constitution Party presentation at your post sometime before July 30, 2006. You can do this by contacting Michael Harrison, web master for the Constitution Party website. Furthermore:

I sincerely apologize to any and all VFW members who were present today at the VFW Paciga Post 4712 - Simpson - Memorial Day event who were offended by my attempt to assert the democratic procedure of petitioning: A process that was secured for us by the men and women who fought and died for our Constitutional republic.

Gasoline at 10 Cents a Gallon . . .

Does gasoline at 10 cents a gallon and falling sound impossible in today's world?

Well, if you think it's impossible, you're wrong. Because that's where gasoline actually is, and it looks like it's going even lower.

Of course, it's not 10 cents a gallon in today's paper money. But it is 10 cents a gallon in the Constitutional money of the United States, which is gold coin and bullion.

Read more: Gasoline at 10 Cents a Gallon and Falling - by George Reisman

The Legal vs Lawful

Circa 1764

They hang the man and flog the woman
That steal the goose from off the common
But let the greater villain loose
That steals the common from the goose.

The law demands that we atone
When we take things we do not own
But leaves the lords and ladies fine
Who take things that are yours and mine.

-- English Nursery Rhyme c. 1764 --

The greater issue before our nation and the world

Here is an excerpt from Paul Craig Roberts' article Bush Has Crossed the Rubicon

In effect, Bush is asserting the powers that accrued to Hitler in 1933. His Federalist Society apologists and Department of Justice appointees claim that President Bush has the same power to interpret the Constitution as the Supreme Court. An Alito Court is likely to agree with this false claim.

This is the great issue that is before the country. But it is pushed into the background by political battles over abortion and homosexual rights. Many people fighting to strengthen the executive think they are fighting against legitimizing sodomy and murder in the womb. They are unaware that the real issue is that America is on the verge of elevating its president above the law.

Bush Justice Department official and Berkeley law professor John Yoo argues that no law can restrict the president in his role as commander-in-chief. Thus, once the president is at war – even a vague open-ended "war on terror" - Bush's Justice Department says the president is free to undertake any action in pursuit of war, including the torture of children and indefinite detention of American citizens.

The commander-in-chief role is probably sufficiently elastic to expand to any crisis, whether real or fabricated. Thus has the US arrived at the verge of dictatorship.

Where are the brooms and shovels in New Orleans?

Have government regulations become so restrictive that the living cannot maintain sanitation by respectfully removing dead bodies from their midst?

Hurricane Katrina has indeed been a tragedy of catastrophic proportions for the people along the Gulf coast. However, the psycho-social implications of incremental Congressional legislation since Roosevelt's "New Deal" is apparent in the pictures coming out of New Orleans via TV.

As I watch, I see many idle people sitting amidst piles of trash and, occasionally, dead bodies. These scenes have shown a remnant of New Orleanins chanting that they need help, yet they seem to be doing nothing to clean up the relatively small area closest to them: Trash and bodies that can lead to foul odors and, ultimately, disease!

Without a doubt, water, food and shelter are vital commodities that need to be provided from sources outside this affected area. But, when it comes to the remnant's self-responsible behaviors (i.e., cleaning around their personal space), this level of dependency on NGO's, and the statutory agents/agencies of federal government to do for them what they can do for themselves should be critically questioned.

Indeed!

Where are the brooms and shovels in New Orleans? And;

Have government regulations become so restrictive that the living cannot maintain sanitation by respectfully removing dead bodies from their midst?

An UPDATE to this post was attempted when I learned that the family of a woman in a "wheel chair" had filed a law suit. The links were removed because the AP News and Find Law links for the articles no longer worked. I don't know if the woman in the 'wheel chair' is the same as the woman in the 'lawn chair', but I wish the family swift vindication for the wrongs that they suffered at the hands of those who are paid to do that which is right.

You do have options.

Click here to see what they are. And here to see why they are necessary.

Supreme Court Nominee John Roberts' Frame-of-Reference

Since Article 4, Section 4, of the US Constitution "shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government"; To whose "Form of Government" is John Roberts, a Harvard graduate, referring when he expresses a "profound appreciation for the role of the court in our constitutional democracy"?

Here is a transcript of a portion of Nominee Roberts' 7/19/2005 acceptance speech from USA Today:

ROBERTS: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you.

Thank you very much. It is both an honor and very humbling to be nominated to serve on the Supreme Court. Before I became a judge, my law practice consisted largely of arguing cases before the court. That experience left me with a profound appreciation for the role of the court in our constitutional democracy and a deep regard for the court as an institution.

The London Explosions

I feel deep sorrow for all the victims of violent acts worldwide that are perpetrated on behalf of a handful of men/women who have an agenda to dominate. What is even more disturbing, however, is how effectively the American people have been manipulated by Madison Avenue words and visuals to buy into this agenda to the point that they are willingly contributing to their own destruction.

For instance: "Terror" is not an "act". "Terror" is a "feeling"; an "emotion".

There are two (2) proven strategies to overcome an emotion: Drugs and Empowerment.

It's been my observation that Congress' focus since the "Brady Bill" and "911" has been to disempower Americans.

Congress has been inclined to use tax payers' debt based dollars to; fund programs that screen for emotional dis-ease, create data bases which include that such screening data to be put on "mandatory" identification cards for which the people are expected to pay a cost, and protect the sharing of the people's personal information with global commercial banking and insurance entities that will eventually benefit the owners of the pharmaceutical companies, who will in turn have legal commercial access to those who have voluntarily opted into their actuarial, pharmaceutical and other studies. I suspect that Herr Mengla is smiling in his grave.

Additionally: Since both the Euro and Dollar are a debt based units of currency; How are the people's of the nations who use this currency to ever pay off a debt with a debt? Intellectually and morally this is absurd! Intellectually and morally this is 'indebted servitude'/"peonage" perpetrated and maintained by a handful of men who globally manipulate the money supply as their allied media strokes the emotions of the people under the guise of "democracy"!

As for this current "War"; It makes sense to me that "Christian" America would be pitted against the "Islamic" nations. How else can the agenda of those who profit from a debt based monetary system, whether the Dollar or the Euro, continue their dominion if there is honest trade among the nations with a tangible currency based on "honest weights and measures".

If we had enough men and women in Congress that took their oath of office seriously, we would have a tangible monetary system, be at peace with Islamic nations, and best of all, there would be no need for those with an agenda to pit believing nations against one another under the guise of "terror". Unlike a drugged or disempowered person, an empowered people have few excuses (if any) to tolerate injustices, or to injure or damage their neighbor.

Excerpt from Steve Peacock's "Sherwood Watch" Website:

"While I encourage all of the devoted visitors to SherwoodWatch.org to visit this site time and time again, I have created a Sherwood Watch Yahoo! Group for the primary purpose of receiving notification of updates to this site. Go to the following link for more information on how to "join."

"Just FYI, anyone can sign up, but only the moderator will be able to send messages to members -- in other words, a little spam-prevention measure for your protection."

FEDS CALL COURT CERTIFIED DOCUMENTS A "THEORY" IN BILL BENSON CASE

Posted: February 15, 2005
1:05 AM Eastern
NewsWithViews.com

Bill Benson is a former revenue collector for the State of Illinois. Back in 1984, Benson was commissioned to conduct an investigation into the ratification of the Sixteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Benson traveled to all 48 states which had been admitted to the Union at the time of the ratification of this amendment in 1913. He spent close to a year in the bowels of these state archives collecting official documents.

What Benson found according to legal researchers was nothing short of a bombshell: Not only was the Sixteenth Amendment - the so-called "income tax amendment' never ratified by the required number of states, he also discovered that the Seventeenth Amendment wasn't ratified either.

More . . .